Appeal & Record Review

Analyse Malaysian appeals and records of appeal, identify appealable errors, preservation of issues, standard of appellate intervention and record references. Use when advising on or preparing an appeal, respondent's case or appellate submissions.

Agent Skill Markdown

Copy Markdown Download MD Download ZIP

---
name: appeal-record-review
description: Analyse Malaysian appeals and records of appeal, identify appealable errors, preservation of issues, standard of appellate intervention and record references. Use when advising on or preparing an appeal, respondent's case or appellate submissions.
---

# Appeal & Record Review

## Core rules

- Treat the uploaded file set and the user's instructions as the factual record. Do not invent missing facts.
- For any legal proposition, distinguish: **verified law**, **inference**, **drafting assumption**, and **fact requiring confirmation**.
- Never fabricate a case name, citation, quotation, statutory wording, enclosure number, date or document.
- Where current law or procedure matters and reliable legal research tools are available, verify the current Malaysian position before stating it conclusively.
- Prefer Malaysian primary sources and binding Malaysian authorities.
- Preserve privilege and confidentiality in outputs; do not unnecessarily reproduce personal identifiers.
- Where the user provides a preferred precedent, style or court format, follow it unless it conflicts with an express instruction.
- Draft in English or Bahasa Malaysia according to the user's request. Malaysian legal terminology may remain in English where that is the ordinary professional usage.
- Be concise. Produce work product rather than generic legal lectures.


## Malaysian legal framework to check

- Courts of Judicature Act 1964
- Rules of Court 2012
- Rules of the Court of Appeal 1994
- Federal Court Rules 1995 where applicable

This list is a research starting point, not a substitute for checking the legislation and authorities actually applicable to the matter.

## Workflow

1. Identify the precise order appealed from and procedural route.
2. Extract findings of fact, law and mixed fact/law from the grounds of judgment.
3. Map proposed grounds to the record and identify preservation problems.
4. Separate disagreement with outcome from appealable error.
5. Check appellate jurisdiction, leave requirements, time limits and stay issues.
6. Prepare a record-reference matrix.

## Default output

- Appeal posture
- Potential grounds
- Respondent answers
- Standard of intervention
- Record references
- Procedural deadlines
- Draft grounds outline

## Quality control

Before finalising:
1. Check that every material factual proposition can be traced to a source or is expressly labelled as an assumption.
2. Check names, dates, figures, document titles and defined terms.
3. Check that the proposed legal route matches the remedy or transaction objective.
4. Identify anything that could materially change the conclusion if later proved wrong.
5. Do not add generic disclaimers. Give the lawyer a usable work product.

appeal-record-review/SKILL.md