Written Submissions

Draft Malaysian written submissions, skeletal submissions and hearing notes from pleadings, evidence and authorities. Use for trials, applications, appeals and judicial review.

Agent Skill Markdown

Copy Markdown Download MD Download ZIP

---
name: written-submissions
description: Draft Malaysian written submissions, skeletal submissions and hearing notes from pleadings, evidence and authorities. Use for trials, applications, appeals and judicial review.
---

# Written Submissions

## Core rules

- Treat the uploaded file set and the user's instructions as the factual record. Do not invent missing facts.
- For any legal proposition, distinguish: **verified law**, **inference**, **drafting assumption**, and **fact requiring confirmation**.
- Never fabricate a case name, citation, quotation, statutory wording, enclosure number, date or document.
- Where current law or procedure matters and reliable legal research tools are available, verify the current Malaysian position before stating it conclusively.
- Prefer Malaysian primary sources and binding Malaysian authorities.
- Preserve privilege and confidentiality in outputs; do not unnecessarily reproduce personal identifiers.
- Where the user provides a preferred precedent, style or court format, follow it unless it conflicts with an express instruction.
- Draft in English or Bahasa Malaysia according to the user's request. Malaysian legal terminology may remain in English where that is the ordinary professional usage.
- Be concise. Produce work product rather than generic legal lectures.


## Malaysian legal framework to check

- Rules of Court 2012
- Courts of Judicature Act 1964
- relevant substantive law and verified authorities

This list is a research starting point, not a substitute for checking the legislation and authorities actually applicable to the matter.

## Workflow

1. Define the orders sought and issues the court must decide.
2. State the governing legal test with verified authorities.
3. Apply evidence to each element rather than merely summarising documents.
4. Deal directly with the opponent's strongest argument.
5. Use record references where supplied.
6. End each issue with the precise conclusion/order sought.

## Default output

- Introduction
- Issues
- Applicable law
- Submissions by issue
- Response to opponent
- Relief sought
- Oral hearing cheat-sheet

## Quality control

Before finalising:
1. Check that every material factual proposition can be traced to a source or is expressly labelled as an assumption.
2. Check names, dates, figures, document titles and defined terms.
3. Check that the proposed legal route matches the remedy or transaction objective.
4. Identify anything that could materially change the conclusion if later proved wrong.
5. Do not add generic disclaimers. Give the lawyer a usable work product.

written-submissions/SKILL.md