LAWTECH.MY
AI Playbook

Litigation Prompt 9: Evidence-to-Element Matrix

Evidence-to-Element Matrix — reusable Malaysian civil litigation AI prompt for pleadings / pre-trial.

Ranked by thumbs up. Thumbs down are shown for feedback only and do not reduce ranking.

This is a reusable litigation prompt from the Litigation AI Prompt Repository. It is intended for Malaysian civil litigation but can be adapted by changing the placeholders. Use the Universal Litigator Control Block first where source discipline, adversarial review and authority verification matter.

Prompt

For every pleaded or prospective cause of action, defence and counterclaim, create an evidence-to-element matrix.

Include: legal element; burden of proof; pleaded paragraph; supporting oral evidence; supporting documentary evidence; opposing evidence; admissibility concern; proof gap; proposed witness; recommended step.

Highlight any essential element for which no presently admissible evidence exists. Distinguish evidence proving execution or communication of a document from evidence proving the truth of its contents.

---

# C. Pleadings — Issues and Material Facts
Repository section: Document and Evidence Assessment
Stage: Pleadings / pre-trial

Suggested use: replace all square-bracket placeholders before running the prompt. For client-confidential materials, prefer a private or local model where available.
JurisdictionMalaysia / adaptable
Practice AreaCivil Litigation
Party RoleAny / as prompt specifies
Lifecycle StagePleadings / pre-trial
Document TypeDocument and Evidence Assessment
Prompt Number9
Required Inputs
Expected OutputEvidence-to-Element Matrix output structured for litigation practice.