AI Playbook
Litigation Prompt 12: Agreed, Disputed and Irrelevant Facts
Agreed, Disputed and Irrelevant Facts — reusable Malaysian civil litigation AI prompt for post-pleadings / pre-trial.
This is a reusable litigation prompt from the Litigation AI Prompt Repository. It is intended for Malaysian civil litigation but can be adapted by changing the placeholders. Use the Universal Litigator Control Block first where source discipline, adversarial review and authority verification matter.
Prompt
Compare the pleadings and evidence in `[MATERIALS]`. Prepare: 1. proposed agreed facts; 2. facts admitted on the pleadings; 3. facts genuinely disputed; 4. apparent disputes that are semantic or immaterial; 5. legal issues for determination; 6. mixed questions of fact and law; 7. issues that no longer arise; 8. facts requiring clarification before agreement. Draft each agreed fact neutrally and narrowly so that accepting it does not concede a disputed inference. Cite its source and relevant pleading paragraphs. --- # D. Pleadings — Drafting
Repository section: Pleadings — Issues and Material Facts
Stage: Post-pleadings / pre-trial
Suggested use: replace all square-bracket placeholders before running the prompt. For client-confidential materials, prefer a private or local model where available.
Stage: Post-pleadings / pre-trial
Suggested use: replace all square-bracket placeholders before running the prompt. For client-confidential materials, prefer a private or local model where available.
| Jurisdiction | Malaysia / adaptable |
| Practice Area | Civil Litigation |
| Party Role | Any / as prompt specifies |
| Lifecycle Stage | Post-pleadings / pre-trial |
| Document Type | Pleadings — Issues and Material Facts |
| Prompt Number | 12 |
| Required Inputs | |
| Expected Output | Agreed, Disputed and Irrelevant Facts output structured for litigation practice. |