LAWTECH.MY
AI Playbook

Litigation Prompt 15: Draft Defence

Draft Defence — reusable Malaysian civil litigation AI prompt for pleadings.

Ranked by thumbs up. Thumbs down are shown for feedback only and do not reduce ranking.

This is a reusable litigation prompt from the Litigation AI Prompt Repository. It is intended for Malaysian civil litigation but can be adapted by changing the placeholders. Use the Universal Litigator Control Block first where source discipline, adversarial review and authority verification matter.

Prompt

Draft a Defence for `[DEFENDANT]` in answer to `[STATEMENT OF CLAIM]`, using `[CLIENT INSTRUCTIONS]` and `[MATERIALS]`.

Respond paragraph by paragraph. Use admissions, non-admissions and denials accurately. Every denial should state the Defendant’s positive case where one exists. Avoid evasive denials and do not deny matters that the documents establish.

Plead all affirmative defences and material facts relied upon, including any relevant limitation, jurisdiction, standing, contractual construction, performance, waiver, estoppel, illegality, causation, remoteness, mitigation, set-off or failure of proof. Preserve properly supportable alternative positions.

If the client’s instructions conflict with objective records, flag the conflict before the draft and use a placeholder rather than selecting a convenient version. Conclude with the appropriate prayer and provide a post-draft table of admissions, disputed issues and evidence required.
Repository section: Pleadings — Drafting
Stage: Pleadings

Suggested use: replace all square-bracket placeholders before running the prompt. For client-confidential materials, prefer a private or local model where available.
JurisdictionMalaysia / adaptable
Practice AreaCivil Litigation
Party RoleAny / as prompt specifies
Lifecycle StagePleadings
Document TypePleadings — Drafting
Prompt Number15
Required Inputs
Expected OutputDraft Defence output structured for litigation practice.