LAWTECH.MY
AI Playbook

Litigation Prompt 18: Request and Response for Further and Better Particulars

Request and Response for Further and Better Particulars — reusable Malaysian civil litigation AI prompt for post-pleadings.

Ranked by thumbs up. Thumbs down are shown for feedback only and do not reduce ranking.

This is a reusable litigation prompt from the Litigation AI Prompt Repository. It is intended for Malaysian civil litigation but can be adapted by changing the placeholders. Use the Universal Litigator Control Block first where source discipline, adversarial review and authority verification matter.

Prompt

Review `[PLEADING]` and draft a focused request for further and better particulars.

Request only particulars necessary to understand the case to be met, define the issues, prevent surprise or prepare for trial. Do not seek evidence, documents, admissions or answers to interrogatories under the guise of particulars.

Use a table identifying the pleading paragraph, words requiring particulars, particulars sought and why they are necessary.

If acting for the responding party instead, draft answers that are sufficient and candid without pleading evidence or expanding the case beyond instructions. Identify requests that are oppressive, evidential, irrelevant or already answered.

---

# E. Interlocutory Applications and Affidavits
Repository section: Pleadings — Drafting
Stage: Post-pleadings

Suggested use: replace all square-bracket placeholders before running the prompt. For client-confidential materials, prefer a private or local model where available.
JurisdictionMalaysia / adaptable
Practice AreaCivil Litigation
Party RoleAny / as prompt specifies
Lifecycle StagePost-pleadings
Document TypePleadings — Drafting
Prompt Number18
Required Inputs
Expected OutputRequest and Response for Further and Better Particulars output structured for litigation practice.