LAWTECH.MY
AI Playbook

Litigation Prompt 22: Affidavit in Reply / Opposition

Affidavit in Reply / Opposition — reusable Malaysian civil litigation AI prompt for interlocutory.

Ranked by thumbs up. Thumbs down are shown for feedback only and do not reduce ranking.

This is a reusable litigation prompt from the Litigation AI Prompt Repository. It is intended for Malaysian civil litigation but can be adapted by changing the placeholders. Use the Universal Litigator Control Block first where source discipline, adversarial review and authority verification matter.

Prompt

Draft `[AFFIDAVIT IN REPLY / AFFIDAVIT IN OPPOSITION]` responding to `[OPPOSING AFFIDAVIT]`.

Prepare first a response matrix listing each material paragraph, whether admitted or disputed, the responsive evidence and source. In the affidavit, answer only material matters and avoid argumentative commentary.

Identify:

- new facts requiring response;
- inaccuracies or incomplete accounts;
- documents requiring contextual explanation;
- matters outside the opposing deponent’s knowledge;
- hearsay or unsupported assertions;
- points properly reserved for submissions.

Preserve the burden of proof. Do not allow the responding affidavit to become a substitute for evidence the original application was required to provide.
Repository section: Interlocutory Applications and Affidavits
Stage: Interlocutory

Suggested use: replace all square-bracket placeholders before running the prompt. For client-confidential materials, prefer a private or local model where available.
JurisdictionMalaysia / adaptable
Practice AreaCivil Litigation
Party RoleAny / as prompt specifies
Lifecycle StageInterlocutory
Document TypeInterlocutory Applications and Affidavits
Prompt Number22
Required Inputs
Expected OutputAffidavit in Reply / Opposition output structured for litigation practice.