LAWTECH.MY
AI Playbook

Litigation Prompt 32: Draft Witness Statement

Draft Witness Statement — reusable Malaysian civil litigation AI prompt for pre-trial / trial.

Ranked by thumbs up. Thumbs down are shown for feedback only and do not reduce ranking.

This is a reusable litigation prompt from the Litigation AI Prompt Repository. It is intended for Malaysian civil litigation but can be adapted by changing the placeholders. Use the Universal Litigator Control Block first where source discipline, adversarial review and authority verification matter.

Prompt

Draft a witness statement for `[WITNESS]` on behalf of `[PARTY]` based only on `[WITNESS INSTRUCTIONS]` and `[MATERIALS]`.

Use the witness’s own perspective and level of knowledge. Establish identity, role and basis of knowledge. Arrange evidence chronologically or by issue. Refer accurately to documents the witness can identify or authenticate.

Do not:

- put words or legal conclusions into the witness’s mouth;
- conceal adverse facts;
- state matters outside personal knowledge without identifying the source;
- reproduce pleadings as testimony;
- include submissions or comment on another witness’s credibility.

Mark every fact not clearly supported by the witness’s instructions as `[CONFIRM WITH WITNESS]`. After the draft, provide a verification checklist and identify likely cross-examination areas.
Repository section: Case Management and Trial Preparation
Stage: Pre-trial / trial

Suggested use: replace all square-bracket placeholders before running the prompt. For client-confidential materials, prefer a private or local model where available.
JurisdictionMalaysia / adaptable
Practice AreaCivil Litigation
Party RoleAny / as prompt specifies
Lifecycle StagePre-trial / trial
Document TypeCase Management and Trial Preparation
Prompt Number32
Required Inputs
Expected OutputDraft Witness Statement output structured for litigation practice.