LAWTECH.MY
AI Playbook

Litigation Prompt 50: Litigation Draft Quality Assurance

Litigation Draft Quality Assurance — reusable Malaysian civil litigation AI prompt for any.

Ranked by thumbs up. Thumbs down are shown for feedback only and do not reduce ranking.

This is a reusable litigation prompt from the Litigation AI Prompt Repository. It is intended for Malaysian civil litigation but can be adapted by changing the placeholders. Use the Universal Litigator Control Block first where source discipline, adversarial review and authority verification matter.

Prompt

Perform a senior counsel quality-control review of `[DRAFT]` against `[SOURCE MATERIALS]`.

Check:

- factual accuracy and source support;
- party names, capacities, dates, sums and defined terms;
- consistency with pleadings and prior positions;
- legal propositions and verified authorities;
- jurisdiction, limitation and procedural compliance;
- internal logic and requested relief;
- evidential admissibility and burden;
- omissions, contradictions and overstatement;
- tone, clarity, duplication and formatting;
- confidentiality, privilege and necessary redactions.

Produce a high-priority defect list, paragraph-specific corrections and a clean revised draft. Do not silently alter a substantive position; identify it for counsel’s decision.

---

# Suggested Repository Taxonomy

Use multiple tags where appropriate:

| Primary stage | Suggested tags |
|---|---|
| Onboarding | `client-intake` `conflict` `objectives` `initial-assessment` |
| Pre-action | `legal-opinion` `strategy` `limitation` `demand` `settlement` |
| Pleadings | `material-facts` `statement-of-claim` `defence` `counterclaim` `reply` `particulars` |
| Interlocutory | `affidavit` `discovery` `injunction` `striking-out` `summary-judgment` `amendment` |
| Case management | `directions` `agreed-facts` `issues` `bundle` `timeline` |
| Pre-trial | `witnesses` `evidence-matrix` `admissibility` `trial-plan` |
| Trial | `witness-statement` `cross-examination` `notes-of-evidence` `objections` |
| Submissions | `interlocutory-submissions` `closing-submissions` `reply-submissions` `oral-advocacy` |
| Appeal | `judgment-analysis` `grounds-of-appeal` `appellate-submissions` `stay` |
| Post-judgment | `order` `costs` `enforcement` `closure` |
| General | `red-team` `research` `quality-control` `settlement` |

## Recommended Metadata for Each Saved Prompt

```yaml
title: [Short prompt title]
jurisdiction: [Malaysia / General]
practice_area: [Civil / Commercial / Corporate / Land / Strata / etc.]
party_role: [Plaintiff / Defendant / Applicant / Respondent / Neutral]
lifecycle_stage: [Onboarding / Pleadings / Interlocutory / Pre-trial / Trial / Appeal / Enforcement]
document_type: [Opinion / Pleading / Affidavit / Submissions / Analysis / Plan]
tags: [litigation, ...]
required_inputs:
  - [Input 1]
  - [Input 2]
output_language: [English / Bahasa Malaysia]
version: 1.0
```
Repository section: General Strategic and Quality-Control Prompts
Stage: Any

Suggested use: replace all square-bracket placeholders before running the prompt. For client-confidential materials, prefer a private or local model where available.
JurisdictionMalaysia / adaptable
Practice AreaCivil Litigation
Party RoleAny / as prompt specifies
Lifecycle StageAny
Document TypeGeneral Strategic and Quality-Control Prompts
Prompt Number50
Required Inputs
Expected OutputLitigation Draft Quality Assurance output structured for litigation practice.