LAWTECH.MY — Practical legal technology for Malaysian practice
AI Playbook

NotebookLM Litigation Prompts: Agreed Facts

Short sequential NotebookLM prompts for agreed facts using uploaded litigation documents, with source/page grounding and gap checking.

Community feedback only. Editorial ordering is based on relevance, review status and currency.

Use only as a supervised litigation preparation aid. Verify every material point against the uploaded sources and current law.

Prompt

Standing instruction: Answer only from the uploaded sources. Identify the document and page/source supporting each material proposition. Do not invent missing facts. Where the documents conflict, identify the conflict. Distinguish fact, allegation, evidence and submission.

Run these prompts sequentially:
1. Identify facts admitted in the pleadings.
2. Identify facts supported by documents from both parties.
3. Prepare proposed agreed facts in neutral language.
4. Separate agreed facts from disputed facts.

Description

Short sequential NotebookLM prompts for agreed facts using uploaded litigation documents, with source/page grounding and gap checking.

These prompts are intended to be run as a series rather than pasted as one long instruction. They work best after the relevant pleadings, affidavits, exhibits, correspondence, bundles, notes of evidence, judgments or appeal papers have been uploaded into the notebook.

Standing instruction

> Standing instruction: Answer only from the uploaded sources. Identify the document and page/source supporting each material proposition. Do not invent missing facts. Where the documents conflict, identify the conflict. Distinguish fact, allegation, evidence and submission.

Prompt series

  1. Identify facts admitted in the pleadings.
  1. Identify facts supported by documents from both parties.
  1. Prepare proposed agreed facts in neutral language.
  1. Separate agreed facts from disputed facts.

---

Verification

  • Require document and page/source references for material propositions.
  • Separate facts, allegations, evidence and submissions.
  • Flag contradictions, missing documents and uncertain points.
  • Do not use the output directly for filing without lawyer review.
DifficultyIntermediate
Compatible ModelsNotebookLM, Gemini
Expected OutputA source-grounded working table or issue list responsive to the prompt series, with missing evidence and conflicts identified.
CategoryNotebookLM Litigation Prompts
Prompt StyleShort sequential prompt series
Series Number29
Prompt Count4
Reviewed On2026-10-01
Version1.0