NotebookLM Litigation Prompts: Case Authorities
Short sequential NotebookLM prompts for case authorities using uploaded litigation documents, with source/page grounding and gap checking.
Use only as a supervised litigation preparation aid. Verify every material point against the uploaded sources and current law.
Prompt
Standing instruction: Answer only from the uploaded sources. Identify the document and page/source supporting each material proposition. Do not invent missing facts. Where the documents conflict, identify the conflict. Distinguish fact, allegation, evidence and submission. Run these prompts sequentially: 1. List every case authority referred to in the uploaded documents. 2. For each authority, identify the legal proposition for which it is cited. 3. Identify authorities cited by both parties. 4. Identify authorities dealing directly with the principal issue. 5. Compare how the parties rely on the same authority differently. 6. Prepare an authorities table: case, court, proposition and party relying upon it. 7. Identify authorities mentioned in submissions but missing from the bundle.
Description
Short sequential NotebookLM prompts for case authorities using uploaded litigation documents, with source/page grounding and gap checking.
These prompts are intended to be run as a series rather than pasted as one long instruction. They work best after the relevant pleadings, affidavits, exhibits, correspondence, bundles, notes of evidence, judgments or appeal papers have been uploaded into the notebook.
Standing instruction
> Standing instruction: Answer only from the uploaded sources. Identify the document and page/source supporting each material proposition. Do not invent missing facts. Where the documents conflict, identify the conflict. Distinguish fact, allegation, evidence and submission.
Prompt series
List every case authority referred to in the uploaded documents.
For each authority, identify the legal proposition for which it is cited.
Identify authorities cited by both parties.
Identify authorities dealing directly with the principal issue.
Compare how the parties rely on the same authority differently.
Prepare an authorities table: case, court, proposition and party relying upon it.
Identify authorities mentioned in submissions but missing from the bundle.
---
Verification
- Require document and page/source references for material propositions.
- Separate facts, allegations, evidence and submissions.
- Flag contradictions, missing documents and uncertain points.
- Do not use the output directly for filing without lawyer review.
| Difficulty | Intermediate |
| Compatible Models | NotebookLM, Gemini |
| Expected Output | A source-grounded working table or issue list responsive to the prompt series, with missing evidence and conflicts identified. |
| Category | NotebookLM Litigation Prompts |
| Prompt Style | Short sequential prompt series |
| Series Number | 35 |
| Prompt Count | 7 |
| Reviewed On | 2026-10-01 |
| Version | 1.0 |