NotebookLM Litigation Prompts: Closing Submissions
Short sequential NotebookLM prompts for closing submissions using uploaded litigation documents, with source/page grounding and gap checking.
Use only as a supervised litigation preparation aid. Verify every material point against the uploaded sources and current law.
Prompt
Standing instruction: Answer only from the uploaded sources. Identify the document and page/source supporting each material proposition. Do not invent missing facts. Where the documents conflict, identify the conflict. Distinguish fact, allegation, evidence and submission. Run these prompts sequentially: 1. For each issue to be tried, summarise the evidence supporting each side. 2. Identify the strongest documentary evidence supporting our pleaded case. 3. Identify admissions obtained during trial relevant to each issue. 4. Prepare a submissions outline organised by the issues to be tried. 5. Prepare a factual submissions section using the documentary record and oral evidence. 6. Identify inconsistencies in the opposing party's evidence for use in submissions. 7. Identify pleaded allegations that were not proved at trial. 8. Identify evidence given at trial that was never pleaded. 9. Prepare a concise conclusion tying the evidence to the reliefs sought.
Description
Short sequential NotebookLM prompts for closing submissions using uploaded litigation documents, with source/page grounding and gap checking.
These prompts are intended to be run as a series rather than pasted as one long instruction. They work best after the relevant pleadings, affidavits, exhibits, correspondence, bundles, notes of evidence, judgments or appeal papers have been uploaded into the notebook.
Standing instruction
> Standing instruction: Answer only from the uploaded sources. Identify the document and page/source supporting each material proposition. Do not invent missing facts. Where the documents conflict, identify the conflict. Distinguish fact, allegation, evidence and submission.
Prompt series
For each issue to be tried, summarise the evidence supporting each side.
Identify the strongest documentary evidence supporting our pleaded case.
Identify admissions obtained during trial relevant to each issue.
Prepare a submissions outline organised by the issues to be tried.
Prepare a factual submissions section using the documentary record and oral evidence.
Identify inconsistencies in the opposing party's evidence for use in submissions.
Identify pleaded allegations that were not proved at trial.
Identify evidence given at trial that was never pleaded.
Prepare a concise conclusion tying the evidence to the reliefs sought.
---
Verification
- Require document and page/source references for material propositions.
- Separate facts, allegations, evidence and submissions.
- Flag contradictions, missing documents and uncertain points.
- Do not use the output directly for filing without lawyer review.
| Difficulty | Intermediate |
| Compatible Models | NotebookLM, Gemini |
| Expected Output | A source-grounded working table or issue list responsive to the prompt series, with missing evidence and conflicts identified. |
| Category | NotebookLM Litigation Prompts |
| Prompt Style | Short sequential prompt series |
| Series Number | 34 |
| Prompt Count | 9 |
| Reviewed On | 2026-10-01 |
| Version | 1.0 |