NotebookLM Litigation Prompts: Interlocutory Injunction
Short sequential NotebookLM prompts for interlocutory injunction using uploaded litigation documents, with source/page grounding and gap checking.
Use only as a supervised litigation preparation aid. Verify every material point against the uploaded sources and current law.
Prompt
Standing instruction: Answer only from the uploaded sources. Identify the document and page/source supporting each material proposition. Do not invent missing facts. Where the documents conflict, identify the conflict. Distinguish fact, allegation, evidence and submission. Run these prompts sequentially: 1. Identify facts supporting the existence of a serious issue to be tried. 2. Identify evidence of irreparable or difficult-to-quantify harm. 3. Identify facts relevant to the balance of convenience. 4. Identify delay or acquiescence that may affect injunctive relief. 5. Identify evidence supporting urgency. 6. Prepare a short factual narrative supporting an injunction application. 7. Identify undertakings or safeguards appearing appropriate from the evidence.
Description
Short sequential NotebookLM prompts for interlocutory injunction using uploaded litigation documents, with source/page grounding and gap checking.
These prompts are intended to be run as a series rather than pasted as one long instruction. They work best after the relevant pleadings, affidavits, exhibits, correspondence, bundles, notes of evidence, judgments or appeal papers have been uploaded into the notebook.
Standing instruction
> Standing instruction: Answer only from the uploaded sources. Identify the document and page/source supporting each material proposition. Do not invent missing facts. Where the documents conflict, identify the conflict. Distinguish fact, allegation, evidence and submission.
Prompt series
Identify facts supporting the existence of a serious issue to be tried.
Identify evidence of irreparable or difficult-to-quantify harm.
Identify facts relevant to the balance of convenience.
Identify delay or acquiescence that may affect injunctive relief.
Identify evidence supporting urgency.
Prepare a short factual narrative supporting an injunction application.
Identify undertakings or safeguards appearing appropriate from the evidence.
---
Verification
- Require document and page/source references for material propositions.
- Separate facts, allegations, evidence and submissions.
- Flag contradictions, missing documents and uncertain points.
- Do not use the output directly for filing without lawyer review.
| Difficulty | Intermediate |
| Compatible Models | NotebookLM, Gemini |
| Expected Output | A source-grounded working table or issue list responsive to the prompt series, with missing evidence and conflicts identified. |
| Category | NotebookLM Litigation Prompts |
| Prompt Style | Short sequential prompt series |
| Series Number | 11 |
| Prompt Count | 7 |
| Reviewed On | 2026-10-01 |
| Version | 1.0 |