NotebookLM Litigation Prompts: Pleadings — General Review
Short sequential NotebookLM prompts for pleadings — general review using uploaded litigation documents, with source/page grounding and gap checking.
Use only as a supervised litigation preparation aid. Verify every material point against the uploaded sources and current law.
Prompt
Standing instruction: Answer only from the uploaded sources. Identify the document and page/source supporting each material proposition. Do not invent missing facts. Where the documents conflict, identify the conflict. Distinguish fact, allegation, evidence and submission. Run these prompts sequentially: 1. Analyse the Statement of Claim paragraph by paragraph and identify the purpose of each paragraph. 2. Identify all material facts pleaded in the Statement of Claim. 3. Identify allegations that appear to be evidence rather than material facts. 4. Identify allegations that may lack sufficient particulars. 5. Identify allegations of fraud, misrepresentation, conspiracy, negligence or breach of trust requiring particulars. 6. Identify internal inconsistencies in the Statement of Claim. 7. Identify inconsistencies between the Statement of Claim and the uploaded evidence. 8. Identify facts appearing in the evidence that have not been pleaded. 9. Identify pleaded facts for which there appears to be no evidence. 10. Identify possible amendments required to align the pleadings with the evidence.
Description
Short sequential NotebookLM prompts for pleadings — general review using uploaded litigation documents, with source/page grounding and gap checking.
These prompts are intended to be run as a series rather than pasted as one long instruction. They work best after the relevant pleadings, affidavits, exhibits, correspondence, bundles, notes of evidence, judgments or appeal papers have been uploaded into the notebook.
Standing instruction
> Standing instruction: Answer only from the uploaded sources. Identify the document and page/source supporting each material proposition. Do not invent missing facts. Where the documents conflict, identify the conflict. Distinguish fact, allegation, evidence and submission.
Prompt series
Analyse the Statement of Claim paragraph by paragraph and identify the purpose of each paragraph.
Identify all material facts pleaded in the Statement of Claim.
Identify allegations that appear to be evidence rather than material facts.
Identify allegations that may lack sufficient particulars.
Identify allegations of fraud, misrepresentation, conspiracy, negligence or breach of trust requiring particulars.
Identify internal inconsistencies in the Statement of Claim.
Identify inconsistencies between the Statement of Claim and the uploaded evidence.
Identify facts appearing in the evidence that have not been pleaded.
Identify pleaded facts for which there appears to be no evidence.
Identify possible amendments required to align the pleadings with the evidence.
---
Verification
- Require document and page/source references for material propositions.
- Separate facts, allegations, evidence and submissions.
- Flag contradictions, missing documents and uncertain points.
- Do not use the output directly for filing without lawyer review.
| Difficulty | Intermediate |
| Compatible Models | NotebookLM, Gemini |
| Expected Output | A source-grounded working table or issue list responsive to the prompt series, with missing evidence and conflicts identified. |
| Category | NotebookLM Litigation Prompts |
| Prompt Style | Short sequential prompt series |
| Series Number | 4 |
| Prompt Count | 10 |
| Reviewed On | 2026-10-01 |
| Version | 1.0 |